
9th August: NHL-stars on weak ice
The players of the NHL are the
greatest hockey players in the world. Their fat contracts should be enough proof of that.
However, being the greatest of your kind in the world doesnt seem to mean
youre guaranteed top-notch working conditions. In a lot of NHL-arenas, the quality
of the ice is far from good. Sometimes the ice can become so weak that the risk of players
injuring themselves is several times bigger than normal. Even the quality of the game
itself can suffer from bad ice conditions. Many of the leagues greatest players keep complaining about this phenomenon. Philadelphias Eric Lindros is maybe the one that has been complaining the most. According to him, its strange that the clubs invest 200-300 million dollars in high-standard, luxury arenas, but it would be nice if the ice had the same standard as the fancy dressrooms. Lindros also says that the game would be much faster and harder if they just could give it all in a match, which the bad ice quality now prevents them from doing. Other star players stick to the same. Anaheims Teemu Selänne claims that this is one of the leagues major problems. Steve Yzerman, Detroit, means that if you want to raise the standard of the NHL hockey games, you have to begin with improving ice quality. New Yorks Madison Square Garden is said to be the arena with the worst ice quality. There the ice gets so weak in the end of the periods that its almost impossible to pass thoroughly. The ice surface becomes rough and soft. Other arenas with bad ice quality are Reunion Arena in Dallas, Arrowhead Pond in Anaheim and Staples Centre in Los Angeles. On the other hand, among the arenas with the best quality of ice are Skyreach Center in Edmonton (the cold and dry air keeps the ice in good condition - the best ice in the whole league), Joe Louis Arena in Detroit and Canadian Airlines Saddledome in Calgary. The reasons to the bad quality of ice are many. For instance, New Yorks Madison Square Garden is used for too many other events than hockey (basketball, boxing, tennis, conserts). These other events need a particular temporary floor on top of the ice, which of course only harms the ice underneath. Another reason are the "smoke-shows" during which the players are introduced. Even 30 seconds of smoke in the arena can ruin the whole ice. The smoke creates moisture in the air, which at least doesnt improve the ice =). What kind of water you use to make the ice also plays an important role. Cleaner water makes better ice, and because theres cleaner water outside than in the bigger cities, its often the smaller cities that has got better ice qualities in their arenas. Therefore, its logical that big towns like LA, Dallas, Detroit and New York suffers from problems like this. In my point of view, this seems like a problem that shouldnt exist. Come on, NHL is such a big league that problems like this just dont should be allowed. Where I live (in Finland), this is not a problem at all. But on the other hand, Finland isnt as exploited as USA, and therefore we have much cleaner water here. But isnt it still strange, that I can go watch a division 2 hockey game in my hometown, knowing that weve got better conditions to play in than even in the big, big cities of New York and Los Angeles. But again, NHL has to get rid of this problem now! Of course the game should be played at its maximum! Or would it be better that we demolished all the arenas and started to play outdoors again, just like before? Do something about this, quickly! Its silly... |
| Here's a list of all the
articles written by Fabian for TUJJS except the newest one which is the one above: Click the one you'd like to read 04 Aug. The Finns in NHL 30 July. Kladno - The home of a hero 29 July. Floorball - A sport for all of us 30 June. The Penguins vs. the Penguin |
| Click here to return to TUJJS mainpage |